<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Our Theater Not Want To Evolve?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dennisbaker.net/does-our-theater-not-want-to-evolve/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dennisbaker.net/does-our-theater-not-want-to-evolve/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:51:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: What If Artists and Marketing Work Together? â€” FuzzBucket</title>
		<link>http://www.dennisbaker.net/does-our-theater-not-want-to-evolve/comment-page-1/#comment-37260</link>
		<dc:creator>What If Artists and Marketing Work Together? â€” FuzzBucket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennisbaker.net/?p=1623#comment-37260</guid>
		<description>[...] Baker asks, why canâ€™t a theater hire someone to fill a staff position and an acting role? Which seems like a great idea. But even when this isn&#8217;t possible, simply having a better [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Baker asks, why canâ€™t a theater hire someone to fill a staff position and an acting role? Which seems like a great idea. But even when this isn&#8217;t possible, simply having a better [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.dennisbaker.net/does-our-theater-not-want-to-evolve/comment-page-1/#comment-37190</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 23:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennisbaker.net/?p=1623#comment-37190</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Dave.  I did not see the episode of Theater Talk that you mention, but the marketing campaign was out there, and I could see how the artists involved, might not have been 100% on board.  Good to hear you have been able to be involved in both spheres, I look forward to hearing what you learn from working with both marketing and the artists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Dave.  I did not see the episode of Theater Talk that you mention, but the marketing campaign was out there, and I could see how the artists involved, might not have been 100% on board.  Good to hear you have been able to be involved in both spheres, I look forward to hearing what you learn from working with both marketing and the artists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Charest</title>
		<link>http://www.dennisbaker.net/does-our-theater-not-want-to-evolve/comment-page-1/#comment-37189</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Charest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 22:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennisbaker.net/?p=1623#comment-37189</guid>
		<description>Dennis, 

Very well, thought out post. 

I agree with you 100%. Being one that also wears both hats, and loves both aspects. I find it all about transferring that enthusiasm between the two. 

Alas part of the problem seems to be the disconnection between the marketing dept. and the artist that has caused much of the dislike of marketing in the first place. 

I remember watching an episode of  Theater Talk that had director Terry Kinney and actor Thomas Sadoski of REASONS TO BE PRETTY. The topic of the marketing campaign for the show came up and the both looked pretty disgusted. 

It seems the angle the marketers took had nothing to do with the play they were creating.

This presents a problem. It puts the the artists and marketing at odds. 

This is why it&#039;s important to work with the artists to latch on to their vision of the work as it develops. It&#039;s the marketers job to translate that to the audience. 

And as you say having someone who understands both aspects makes it easier to work out. 

With a current client I&#039;ve taken on the role much like you mention. I consider myself a liaison between the audience and the rest of the organization. My job, or the job of the person I&#039;ve trained, is to find out what interests the existing audience. Then get that information to them.

We&#039;ve seen greater involvement from the subscriber base by engaging them more like this. 

Thanks for the post, Dennis. 

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis, </p>
<p>Very well, thought out post. </p>
<p>I agree with you 100%. Being one that also wears both hats, and loves both aspects. I find it all about transferring that enthusiasm between the two. </p>
<p>Alas part of the problem seems to be the disconnection between the marketing dept. and the artist that has caused much of the dislike of marketing in the first place. </p>
<p>I remember watching an episode of  Theater Talk that had director Terry Kinney and actor Thomas Sadoski of REASONS TO BE PRETTY. The topic of the marketing campaign for the show came up and the both looked pretty disgusted. </p>
<p>It seems the angle the marketers took had nothing to do with the play they were creating.</p>
<p>This presents a problem. It puts the the artists and marketing at odds. </p>
<p>This is why it&#8217;s important to work with the artists to latch on to their vision of the work as it develops. It&#8217;s the marketers job to translate that to the audience. </p>
<p>And as you say having someone who understands both aspects makes it easier to work out. </p>
<p>With a current client I&#8217;ve taken on the role much like you mention. I consider myself a liaison between the audience and the rest of the organization. My job, or the job of the person I&#8217;ve trained, is to find out what interests the existing audience. Then get that information to them.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve seen greater involvement from the subscriber base by engaging them more like this. </p>
<p>Thanks for the post, Dennis. </p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What you missed in the theatrosphere over the holidays &#8211; Praxis Theatre</title>
		<link>http://www.dennisbaker.net/does-our-theater-not-want-to-evolve/comment-page-1/#comment-37178</link>
		<dc:creator>What you missed in the theatrosphere over the holidays &#8211; Praxis Theatre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennisbaker.net/?p=1623#comment-37178</guid>
		<description>[...] theatre writer and artist Dennis Baker reflected on our year-end discussion of the Canadian theatrosphere with an emphasis on what it means to further evolution of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] theatre writer and artist Dennis Baker reflected on our year-end discussion of the Canadian theatrosphere with an emphasis on what it means to further evolution of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MK</title>
		<link>http://www.dennisbaker.net/does-our-theater-not-want-to-evolve/comment-page-1/#comment-37171</link>
		<dc:creator>MK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 15:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennisbaker.net/?p=1623#comment-37171</guid>
		<description>Hey, I&#039;d totally be up for that. I&#039;m one of those people who do get excited by both. So who wants to pay me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I&#8217;d totally be up for that. I&#8217;m one of those people who do get excited by both. So who wants to pay me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

